Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:21
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Some candidates focus on blocking Cuomo’s path a day before NYC’s mayoral primary - AP News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Oral Bacteria Diversity Linked to Depression Symptoms - Neuroscience News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
When Chinese people see my pets, will they think of it as their food?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Science-Backed Tips for Increasing Your Stamina at Any Age - Prevention
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Mark Hughes dissects how Verstappen's win bid imploded - The Race
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How do we know that Taylor Swift was originally a brunette?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Tahini Is The High Protein Food You Can Eat Every Day—With Almost Everything - Vogue
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Simulations find ghostly whirls of dark matter trailing galaxy arms - Ars Technica